Formalising Performative Interaction

Alan Dix, Jennifer G. Sheridan
Lancaster University, UK
< @ Alan > < @ Jenn >

  

Stuart Reeves, Steve Benford, Claire O'Malley
Nottingham University, UK
< @ Stuart > < @ Steve > < @ Claire >

Paper at DSVIS'2005, 13-15 July 2005, Newcastle, UK.

Download draft paper (PDF, 172K) | See Springer DOI: 10.1007/11752707_2

Abstract

In this paper we attempt to formalise some of the basic attributes of performative interaction against a background of sociological analysis in order to better understand how computer interfaces may support performance. We show how this generic formalisation can be used in the deconstruction, analysis and understanding of performative action and more broadly in live performance. Two examples of this form of analysis are shown: the installation piece Deus Oculi; and Stelarc's Ping Body performance piece. The analysis of these pieces renders visible the varied (re)mappings of the causal nature of interaction, direct and indirect effects, and how these are perceived and exploited by the various members of performance social groupings. Our aim, then, is to provide a model that can be used to explore the relationships that exist in performative activities across domains.

Keywords: Interactive performance, art installations, formal model, Deus Oculi
Full reference:
A. Dix, J. Sheridan, S. Reeves, S. Benford and C. O'Malley (2005). Formalising Performative Interaction. Proceedings of DSVIS'2005. (Newcastle, UK, 13-15 July 2005). Springer, LNCS 3941, pub. 2006. pp 15-25.
http://www.hcibook.com/alan/papers/
DSVIS2005-performance/
more:
.:thePooch:. ... lots of fun work in performance arts
web site

References

  1. J. Clarke. pros + thesis, pages 208–209. Tate, London, 2004.
  2. E. Goffman. The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, New York, 1959.
  3. E. Goffman. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harper & Row, 1974.
  4. C. Heath and J. Hindmarsh. Analysing interaction: Video, ethnography and situated conduct. In T. May, editor, Qualitative Research in Practice, pages 99–121.
    Sage, 2002.
  5. S. Reeves, S. Benford, C. O’Malley, and M. Fraser. Designing the spectator experience. In Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), April 2005.
  6. D. Saltz. The art of interaction: Interactivity, performativity and computers. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 55(2):117–127, 1997.
  7. R. Schechner. Performance Theory. Routledge, London, 1977.
  8. J. Sheridan, A. Dix, S. Lock, and A. Bayliss. Understanding interaction in ubiquitous guerrilla performances in playful arenas. In Proceedings of British HCI Conference, September 2004.
  9. Stelarc. The body. Switch Journal (online), 2004. Verified 4/3/05.
  10. S. Wilson. Information Arts: Intersections of art, science and technology. The MIT Press, 2002.. 


http://www.hcibook.com/alan/papers/DSVIS2005-performance/

Alan Dix 26/6/2005