Studying studying – academic life as the subject of commercial research

Alan Dix

Talis, Birmingham, UK
HCI Centre, University of Birmingham, UK

This paper offers a personal view on the interplay between the multiple roles of academic and commercial researcher and classroom teacher.   A series of vignettes expose a variety of lessons.  Some of the vignettes are about the way that being an educator of human–computer interaction has informed my practice as an academic researcher about HCI.  Some are about the different ethical expectations when using educational practice as part of commercial research as opposed to academic research.  We also see how the inside knowledge of being a practitioner researcher offers unique insights into rich data and how product orientation can expose gaps in research, surprisingly not so different from the way that teaching students does: with neither developers nor students can you hide fuzzy thinking behind long words!  While there are conflicts that need to be carefully managed, both academic and commercial research have powerful synergies with educational practice.

Keywords: educational technology, research ethics, learning analytics, academic life.

References

1. [Ar10] K. Arnold. 2010. Signals: Applying academic analytics. Educause Quarterly, 33, 1.  http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/signals-applying-academic-analytics
2. [BE11]  BERA. 2011. Ethical Guidelines For Educational Research.  British Educational Research Association.  https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/bera-ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2011
3.  [Br94] S. Brewster. 1994.  Providing a structured method for integrating non-speech audio into human-computer interfaces. PhD Thesis, University of York, UK. http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~stephen/papers/theses/Brewster_thesis.pdf
4. [CM06] J. Carmichael, K. Miller. 2006. The Challenges of Practitioner Research: Some insights into collaboration between Higher and Further Education in the LfLFE Project. In J. Caldwell, et al. (eds) Proceedings of 3rd International CRLL Conference (2005), Glasgow. 700–702. ISBN 1-903661-72-2. http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/lflfe/publications/pubsdocs/
   THE%20CHALLENGES%20OF%20PRACTITIONER%20RESEARCH.doc
5. [DE98] A. Dix, G. Ellis. 1998. Starting simple: adding value to static visualisation through simple interaction. In Proc. AVI '98, ACM, 124–134. DOI: 10.1145/948496.948514
6. [Dx02] A. Dix. 2002. Beyond Intention – pushing boundaries with incidental interaction. Building Bridges: Interdisciplinary Context-Sensitive Computing, Glasgow University, 9 Sept 2002. http://alandix.com/academic/papers/beyond-intention-2002/
7. [DF04] A. Dix, J. Finlay, G. Abowd, R. Beale. 2004. Modelling Rich Interaction. Chapter 18 in Human-Computer Interaction, third edition. http://hcibook.com/e3/chapters/ch18
8. [DL15] A. Dix and J. Leavesley. 2015.  Learning Analytics for the Academic: An Action Perspective. In Journal of Universal Computer Science (JUCS), 21(1):48-65. DOI: 10.3217/jucs-021-01-0048
9. [Dx16a] A. Dix. 2016. Challenge and Potential of Fine Grain, Cross-Institutional Learning Data. L@S: Third Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, ACM (in press). DOI: 10.1145/2876034.2893429
10. [Dx16b] A. Dix. 2016.  More than one way to flip a class: learning analytics for mixed models of learning. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 8(12). DOI: 10.21100/compass.v8i12.275
11. [Dx17] A. Dix. 2017.  Activity modelling for low-intention interaction. Chapter 7 in The Handbook of Formal Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. B. Weyers, J. Bowen, A. Dix, P. Palanque (Eds.), Springer. http://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319518374
12. [Ga93] W. Gaver. 1993. How do we hear in the world? Explorations of ecological acoustics. Ecological Psychology, 5, 4: 285–313.
13. [HY16]  J. Han, H. Yin. 2016. Teacher motivation: Definition, research development and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, 3, 1: 1217819. DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819
14. [HE10] E. Helsper, R. Eynon. 2010. Digital natives: where is the evidence? British educational research journal. 36, 3: 503–520. DOI: 10.1080/01411920902989227
15. [Ki94] A. Kidd. 1994. The marks are on the knowledge worker. In Proc. CHI '94. ACM, 186–191. DOI: 10.1145/191666.191740
16. [Pr01a] M. Prensky. 2001a. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants : Part 1. On the Horizon, 9, 5: 1–6.
17. [Pr01b] M. Prensky. 2001b. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9, 6: 1–6.
18. [WF94] S. Whittaker, D. Frohlich, and O. Daly-Jones. 1994. Informal workplace communication: what is it like and how might we support it?. In Proc. CHI '94. ACM, 131-137. DOI: 10.1145/191666.191726

http://www.hcibook.com/alan/papers/chi2017-remix-studying/

Alan Dix 10/1/2017