[De97] Dearing, R. (1997). Higher education in the learning society (The Dearing Report). Leeds: National Committee of Enquiry into Higher Education.  https://education-uk.org/documents/dearing1997/dearing1997.html

[Dx15a] A. Dix. (2015a). REF2014 Citation Analysis (microsite)  https://alandix.com/ref2014/

[Dx15b] A. Dix. (2015b). Citations and Sub-Area Bias in the UK Research Assessment Process. Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web (ASCW’15) at WebSci 2015. https://alandix.com/academic/papers/WebSci2015-biblimetrics/

[Dx16] A. Dix (2016). Evaluating research assessment: Metrics-based analysis exposes implicit bias in REF2014 results. LSE Impact Blog, March 22nd, 2016. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/03/22/ref2014-and-computer-science-and-informatics-subpanel/

[FC13]  Fortin J-M, Currie DJ (2013) Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding. PLoS ONE 8(6): e65263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065263

[WA15]  Wilsdon, J., Allen, L, et al. (2015). The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363.  https://www.ukri.org/publications/review-of-metrics-in-research-assessment-and-management/

[REF21a]  REF2021 – Results and submissions – Unit of assessment 11: Computer Science and Informatics.  https://results2021.ref.ac.uk/profiles/units-of-assessment/11

[REF21b]  REF2021 – Results and submissions – Environment submissions database. https://results2021.ref.ac.uk/environment

[RE23] Research England 2020/2023.  Research England: how we fund higher education providers.  Published:14 September 2020, Last update:16 May 2023. https://www.ukri.org/publications/research-england-how-we-fund-higher-education-providers/